A simple question with manny details entacted. I must say though, this is quite the question to ask someone and stun them with many wells, and ifs and maybes. I for one have many answers.
Call me evil and call me rude but if I were to be one over the other I would be the harmer. Only because I cannot deal with being hurt, and when I mean hurt, physically hurt. But then again, I would never be able to find myself to cut someone up or stab someone to death. But I would rather be doing the cutting then be recieving the cuts. Let's to say that if I were to be the harmer than I would feel some kind of guilt, let's to say that I would have no guilt, and with no guilt I would be the harmer still. Easyily answered.
If the situation was being the bully by using rude words or be bullied, I would be prefer to be bullied. To explain my answer, it would be merely because I do not really take into account what other people have to say about me, especially if they do not even know me. Sticks and stones can break my bones but words, nah, they are truly something different. So in this case I would be bullied only because I know myself well enough to know that the thoughts of others have nothing to do with who I am as a person or how I live as an individual.
I guess what I am trying to say is that if being harmed is only by words, then I choose to be harmed. If it is with physical pain and with no guilt entact with me after I harm someone, then I would be the harmer.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I don't think you're being evil or rude. I think you're being honest.
Post a Comment